Oh,

Here they are and it's only, oooooh, TEN DAYS AFTER THE STORY BROKE!!!! Or so

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/20/politics/20weapons.html?

AND, it's a really bad piece, supposing a great many things to basically dismiss the importance of this memo.


And, guess what? I was pasting this

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/20/international/asia/20abuse.html?hp&ex=1116648000&
;amp;en=6cca0512a38427c3&ei=5094&partner=homepage

all over the place last night. This is good stuff, you guys, but so is the PROOF that this admin and this preznit was determined to go to war in Iraq WMDs or no! AAAARRRRGH, you people drive me nuts! Will you at least tell us WHAT YOUR EDITORIAL POLICY IS?????